Skip to content

The Arrangement of Structure to Maximize Effect.

Most influential communicators would agree that the more you know about your intended audience the more effectively you can deliver your message. Even knowing the most basic things about who you are intending to effecct with your communication can provide valuable insight into how to best deliver your message in order to maximize the odds that it is recieved, understood, and accepted. We will cover a couple of the most basic options of structuring an assertion for maximum acceptance and effect.

First determine which of two basic groups your audience fits into based on their likelihood of immediately embracing your basic premise and conclusion, without any influence, based solely on their latent uneffected position. By making the determination that the audience that you intend to influence is either generally opposed, or generally supportive, you can do much to change how your message is recieved, just by changing the order of your communication.

When speaking to groups that are generally supportive to your message (as in trying to motivate or inspire current supporters toward actions or behaviors that utilize their latent support toward your communication’s desired goals), it is generally accepted that you can start with a bold statement of conclusion and then continue with a series of supporting statements of build in logical order that increases in emotional association value from weaker to stronger, converging in a climax that calls for the specific action that is desired.

When speaking to an audience that may be more opposed to your conclusions, it is often better to start by presenting unassociated examples or even metaphoric stories that draw the audience in through symbols and analogs that they naturally and comfortably relate to in ways that cast a favorable light on your conclusion. This can be followed by building the supporting statements of reasons from weaker to stronger and converging in a climax of your conclusion presented as the next logical step in the associated chains of logic that have been carefully constructed to lead your audience to the desired conclusion, as well as an emotional release of revalation of discovery of a new and previously unheld position. Some in the audience may want to espouse the position wholeheartedly and even represent the position as if it had always been their own, and may even make claims of holding that position all along.

These methods are in no way a guarantee of acceptance, but when carefully employed, can drastically change the way your message is recieved, and can set up furhter dialogue and behavior that helps frame the thoughts about the topics you are presenting in the most favorable light possible.

Thank you as always for reading and for any comments or suggestions.

On the differences between communicating feelings and communicating thoughts.

The Initial impressions that form our assumptions and motivate immediate action are more often based on emotional feelings than they are intellectual thoughts. Our limbic system is optimized to provide immediate response to stimuli. In a true fight or flight scenario it is does not promote survivability to consider options and use logic to formulate a response to the danger, but instead an immediate reaction that preempts deeper thought as a “better safe than sorry policy” is more effective toward the desired result. Emotion has also been proven to enhance memory, and it is in fact the outstanding emotional content of dramatic or traumatic events that punctuate memories of these events as a sort of master imprint of associations between the emotional content and that which we attribute it’s cause. This process can both serve as positive feedback loop reenforcing behaviors by associating them as the cause that results in the fulfillment of deep emotional needs (as in addiction), and as a means to promote amnesia about things that occur relatively free from noticeable emotional stimuli. Non-emotional memories are typically categorized as unimportant and relegated to minutiae, this allows emotional distraction to cause non-emotional content to become subliminal in nature (below the noticeable threshold), bypassing the critical mind and so can become implanted as an assumption.

Emotions are communicated through the most basic of stimuli: (Visual; color, shape pattern, etc., Sound; tone, rhythm, melody, etc., Smell, Tactile Feeling, etc.) as well as by more complex stimuli through memory and association. Emotions can arise naturally as a reaction to your surrounding environment, but can also be communicated subtly through media as art, or through social interaction, whereas intellectual or cognitive information is conveyed concisely in media as prose and document.

When attempting to motivate action it is imperative to communicate emotional content. Intellectual agreement alone seldom motivates behavior, but serves better as a means to justify behaviors already exhibited.

The seven emotions commonly referred to “basic” emotions are : Anger, Fear, Disgust, Contempt, Joy, Sadness, and Surprise. (these emotions can be detected in people by their subconsciously expressed micro-expressions of the facial muscles)

There are of course other emotions including some that require social context in order to relate: Shame, Guilt, Pride, etc. (these are often expressed in body language and other forms of non-verbal linguistics)

A directive containing emotional impetus, intellectual justification (which is normally only afforded credibility if the impetus is emotionally sympathetic to that being experienced), and a degree of social pressure has the highest likelihood of garnering compliance. Emotions are experienced as a stimuli with an intensity that can be illustrated as a gradient scale. Enough emotional content, either focused or convoluted, will stimulate some type of response. It is the results of this response behavior that determines the context used to form longterm associations. These associations drive the evolution of the persona embodied by the behaviors exhibited during times of emotional stimuli. This persona will subscribe to a worldview consistent with the ultimate justification of their own behavior through the narrative of the memory of their experiences. This worldview will define a social group of those that share it, and an outside group of those that do not.

Decisions that are made based on the feelings of the emotional “limbic mind” cause individuals to frame subsequent thoughts in ways that defend their assumptions to avoid cognitive dissonance. This defense of behaviors is characterized by assertions and arguments that only satisfy like minded people or those that naturally assume the role of follower, and seldom persuade those that do not already agree, or those that do not already consider the opinion to be “expert” or coming from authority. This “preaching to the choir” results in social behaviors that are “celebrated” by that “choir” of like minded people for stating their common assertion or argument in a way that lends credibility to it, or is respected as consistent with expected behavior as the embodiment of their archetypal role. Most see it as more condusive to personal popularity to be supportive of those that they associate with than it is to be oppositional. This fact allows for entire groups to exhibit behavior that very few within the group would adopt on their own if presented with the stimuli and options for behavior within a “social vacuum”.

Critical thinking is a valuable human process, but it is seldom utilized in any true sense, and usually requires great deal of “soul searching” and self analysis or suggestion from close personal relationship to consider questioning one’s already held basic assumptions. Approaching any subject with an open mind requires it to be approached free of emotional impetus and social context. It is this possibility of an error in worldview that threatens one’s belonging to and acceptance by a social group (which is usually defined by common worldview) as well as one’s status or role within that group. The resultant social anxiety, and uncertainty of the role of self, is typically avoided at all cost.

Vast fortunes and massive amounts of human effort and resources are spent producing expert opinions to corroborate already held beliefs, or to combat the ideas and counter arguments of their idealistic opposition in order to promote agendas. Studies are funded by interests in order to create statistics that can be used to back up assumptions as well as their subsequent conclusions. Focus groups are often nothing more than an attempt of those without an original creative idea to mimic the actions of the lowest common denominator of mediocre normality by asking enough members of a population for their untrained opinion. Consultants that mirror and verbalize the already held beliefs of their potential customers tend to be the ones that are more often contracted then the ones that have an opposing point of view. Entire industries are fueled by the desire to saturate media with messages that promote an agenda, and so to dominate popular dialogue with communication that is consistent with said agenda.

Understanding the differences in emotional communication and intellectual communication, can help to develop communications strategies and tactics that efficiently align how your message is received with your communications goals.

These strategies and tactics are best formulated by asking a few basic questions:
1. What is the goal of my message? (am I trying to motivate a new behavior, reinforce an existing behavior, or , etc.?)
2. Who is my intended audience? (what is their “resting” emotional state and what will be their emotional reaction to the stimuli my message contains?)
3. What is the social context? (how will the social dynamic change as a result of their reaction to your message?)
4. Is the information within my message structured in a way that will be understood and fully embraced by my audience? (remember, information is most often used to justify already held beliefs and substantiate behaviors already exhibited. Intellectual views that contradict and oppose already held emotional beliefs are typically dismissed out of hand as non credible, or logically flawed without any true logical comparison of value)

We will continue this series of articles with more specific instruction relating to the “how to” in the utilization of both emotional communication, and informational communications, as well as the use of social interaction and context. Thanks as always for reading, and feel free to ask questions, post comments, or otherwise join in the conversation.

On the morality of: persuasion, influence, and the use of reason in communications and assertion in an argument.

Some people believe in an absolute morality (where things are either right or wrong, black or white, with no moral middle ground or alternate perspective), while others believe morality to be more subjective. Regardless of your own standard of morality, most can easily agree that within society we all exert influence over each other and at times attempt to persuade others with our opinions and understanding. In corporate communications; specifically advertising, marketing, and public relations, it is commonly accepted that any agent that represents the brand’s interest is ethical in doing almost everything short of intentional deceit to influence the conclusion of the audience toward accepting the premise and value proposition being presented. When trying to influence someone’s thinking with reason, the ethics and morality of your communication is widely accepted as shades of gray, but many do agree on the basic structure and layout of a spectrum that can be used to determine the relative ethics and reason of an argument, or specific value proposition.

Influence and persuasion can be described as the exertion of a force that causes the ideas of your audience to be framed in specific ways. Normally, to influence another person’s reasoning, you select and emphasize evidence that supports your argument; you may even omit or de-emphasize evidence that does not cast a favorable light or directly support your argument. Influence and persuasion is often, at best, the telling of a partial truth and a manipulation of facts in order to increase the likelihood of a favorable conclusion. Whether the influence and persuasion of your arguments are ethical and moral is a question of degree. There are, however, certain ground rules that most can agree on.

To be credible, evidence must be:
1. Accurately related
2. Specific enough to relate pertinent facts
3. Sufficient to lead to logical conclusion without requiring a “jump to conclusion” or a “leap of logic”
4. Relevant to the basic conclusions of your argument
5. Meaningful to the audience

The most important point in determining whether or not an argument is being made in an ethical manner, in business or in politics, is accuracy. Accuracy is often argued to be “in eye of the beholder” (as in statistics gathered to promote a conclusion), so for the sake of this article let’s define accuracy as the level with which statements and assertions approximate the truth, and let’s further define deceit as willful misrepresentation of the facts.

Often persuasive arguments fall into one of seven basic fallacies which can be used as indicators that the moral and ethical persuasion for the sake of reason is not necessarily the primary motivation for the argument:
1. Presenting a false premise
2. Wrongly assuming that a premise is accepted by the audience
3. Providing too few examples to support an assertion
4. Offering irrelevant evidence or examples
5. Making ad hominem (or “to the man”) attacks on your opponent rather than challenging your opponent’s argument itself (any name-calling falls into this category)
6. Stereotyping or making faulty assumptions regarding an entire group based on arguments that cite too few specific individual examples to make a determination regarding the characterization of an entire group.
7. Overreaching conclusion or seeking to derive any broader conclusion than evidence warrants.

The following seven sentences are examples of these seven common fallacies and will hopefully help illustrate their use in argument.

1. Everyone agrees the primary role of government is to protect individual freedoms.
2. We all can agree that paying taxes is supporting the best democracy on the planet.
3. George Clooney, who I admire, seems very knowledgeable about such things and he says that the impact of drilling for oil in this location is not an acceptable risk, therefore it must be a bad idea.
4. The depletion of our oil supply is proof that we should devote resources to wind farms.
5. My idiot boss who doesn’t care about anyone else’s opinion supports conservative politics, therefore conservatism must be wrong.
6. Many politicians have been caught making corrupt deals, so all politicians go into public service for personal gain.
7. The recent volatility in the stock market proves that it is no longer a safe place to hold your investments.

Holding to these basic rules of evidence, and being aware of these common fallacies can help to avoid exerting undue influence on others as well as having it exerted on you. I have left several sentences within this article that are examples of the common fallacies, or perhaps I am deceitfully making this assertion in an attempt to persuade you to reread my article! Please feel free to reread the article and see if you can find the fallacies I have included.

I have also included a basic diagram (the “strength of argument pyramid”) to help illustrate the strength of reason spectrum as it relates to assertions in an argument.

Thank you for reading, and please feel free to ask questions, make comments, offer opinions and otherwise join the discussion.

Case Studies: Updating a Logo While Maintaining Customer Loyalty.


Watch this video case study by following this Link to our YouTube Video.

Case Studies: Brand Consolidation

Watch this video case study by following this Link to our YouTube Video.

About Our Case Studies: Practical Application

Hello and welcome to Genesis Solutions case studies. Here we will give as clear and concise an example of the most practical application of the most basic and pragmatic aspects of communication. This category, like the rest of our blog, will remain an informal and hopefully informative reference that will attempt to discuss real world solutions, and offer specific examples, illustrating these points with as few wasted words and as little wasted time as possible. In the interest of focusing resources towards desired results, we do not intend to concern ourselves much about production quality or other tangential concerns. Please feel free to add any comments, etc.

Influencing Behavior Through Communication and Social Interaction (Part 1)

influencing behavior through communication and social interaction

For the purposes of this article, influence can be defined as a force that when exerted results in an effect on one’s environment or others within the environment. This article will discuss the most commonly used forms of influence in communication, and is in no way intended to be a comprehensive set of instructions that outline the utilization of any and all forms of influence. I will, however, attempt to use language of very broad and general nature wherever possible in order to allow for the application of these principals to varied situations and circumstances. I hope to cover the basic dynamics of how and why influence is translated between individual members of a society and how to utilize these rules to exert influence that will result in a desired and predetermined effect.

As social creatures one of our highest priorities is acceptance within a desired social group and the avoidance of social ostracization. In the absence of a threat to one’s existence, this desire is the primary motivator for most outwardly active behaviors. Social pressures present us with expectations and place us within scenes in which our actions provide the realization of common archetypes shared by our social group.

It is this desire to eliminate negative social pressure while attaining social gratification within the target of our influence that allows us to present a value propositon as an interaction between these archetypes that captivates your target and uses their own social conditioning to reenforce their desire to respond and react in certain predetermined ways in order to fulfill what they consider expected behavioral requirements. These requirements are determined by the role they are projecting within whatever social group is most directly responsible for their self image within the prescribed scene.

Some of the most commonly used influential traits are;  confidence, trustworthiness, friendliness, intensity, etc. but, in fact, the very opposite traits can also be used to exert influence in the proper relational context. Although mystery and intrigue itself can be an influential factor, for the purpose of promoting a concise directive, a definitive and well stated stance and statement of character should be the basis on which your influential relationship is founded. 

You must remember that your character is defined solely by the presence and form of the sensory stimuli delivered by whatever medium is being utilized within the context of the contact. All aspects of this medium as well as any other outside factor, condition, or circumstance should be considered and utilized to the fullest extent possible when scripting any exchange that takes place during the contact. This consideration and control of the entire “scene” affords you the highest level of influence over your target. 

Direct influence is most efficiently achieved by boiling down your desired reaction into a basic value proposition, engaging the target of your desired influence in direct communication about this value proposition as a character within specified relationship, and ultimately garnering intellectual agreement with the value proposition that manifests an emotionally motivated physical action.

In order to maximize tangible results, influential communication should encourage and direct it’s target toward a preconceived process or system that will completely facilitate the desired result; the “action step”. It is this action step that must guide the design and implementation of all scripted exchanges that take place between your character and your target. (your character includes any and all factors that can be utilized by you to control the context and framework for presenting the iconic representation of the most basic idea your value proposal represents) 

Since the desired outcome of the “contact” has been predetermined; (the “action step”), the contact should be plotted out and scripted with; a beginning, a middle, and an end, leaving nothing to chance.

By viewing the scripting of a contact as writing a scene that is to be played out by characters within a play, you can detach from the natural social context of self and more completely engineer your “character’s” behavior and communication toward the optimization of influence. It further allows your character to be controlled by your will and not by reaction to environmental stimuli. This detachment of self allows you to assume a strictly objective and purely intellectual approach that will provide an overwhelming preponderance of reason and will promote intellectual agreement with your proposition on the part of your target.

This intellectual agreement, though important, is not enough to cause any real or measurable change in your target since it is simply a change in concept and does not have any outwardly substantial manifestation until some physical action is taken.

To best influence an action your character must be accepted by the target within the context of a relationship. Your relationship must be engaged by the target so that true emotional content is exchanged during the communication as well as basic information. In order to best capitalize on your own natural passions and your own social conditioning, YOU must first be convinced of the value proposition you are representing. You also must have a full confidence in your ability to fulfill the role your character seeks to represent. This personal engagement on your part allows you to properly communicate as your character through a personal understanding of the expectations and assumptions of your target. This fosters the establishment of genuine rapport based on a mutually accepted and shared worldview which defines the social group. The content of the script should not only tap into, but should fully utilize natural symbolic resonance by maintaining consistency with any already occurring descriptions of relationships between archetypes and symbolic narrations within a target’s cultural frame of reference. It is important to understand that emotions are a shared phenomenon propagated by communication between social creatures within a society. There is a natural and accepted mode of emotional expression and response between individuals within any given relationship, and most creatures will strive toward their perception of the most acceptable response within any social group they seek acceptance from. 

Once the intellectual decision has been made, an action can be motivated by fueling the decision with emotion and giving the upwelling passions a channel for expression. This expression itself should be a highly controlled symbol rich analogy representing the attainment of the prescribed relationship and should culminate with the “action step”.  This action step should satisfy the required emotional outlet on the part of the target, and receive the proper and expected social reaction and other outwardly supportive environmental stimuli experienced by the target.

Aligning your value proposition with the basic assumptions of the social group your audience seeks acceptance from, as well as those personally held by your target, will allow you to both intellectually and emotionally elevate your point of view over any question, argument, or objection considered. Without discarding the fundamental assumptions which would threaten their own social acceptance and overall worldview which is the basis of their character identity, your target cannot intellectually maintain any argument against the basic assertions and following chains of logic on which your value proposition is based. Being on the side of reason as well as in a position of emotional influence within a social structure assures a level of authority that is in fact only strengthened by being questioned. Once an agreement is intellectually reached the “action step” should be expediently taken or the decision can be undone simply by having it reframed in a forum or context that doesn’t allow for your direct influence. This is often the cause of “buyers remorse” and the unraveling of and backsliding of those who have been influenced and then go back to their original states. How many failed personal goals, dreams, and aspirations have fallen to this same reframing and justifying of our own original states? For this reason an action step has to be taken that commits the target to the new state and any subsequently required behaviors. Further, a structure for ongoing support that provides positive reenforcement and reward for the desired behavior on the part of the target should be used. But, unless no further action on the part of your target is desired, it is important not to reward the target to the point that you remove the original desire and source of motivation, unless there are other readily available motivating factors that can be used to drive further influence. Otherwise, the complacency of the target that caused lack of action before influence was exerted can simply reestablish itself within the new state after a minor level of initial action is taken. This can cause the reframing of your value proposition in a very skeptical and pessimistic light and can cause an actual backlash against your original value proposition as a reaction.

It is important to note that action is almost always an emotional endeavor and is more often undertaken from the reaction to negative emotional content than it is from a positive emotional aspiration. (people are more likely to run from pain than they are to run towards pleasure) Fear is therefore one of the strongest and most widely used final emotional triggers. (sometimes fear of rejection, fear of disappointment, fear of exposure, etc.) if a positive social reaction is used as a reward for action taken by your target after the initial agreement, the receptiveness of the target to your suggestion and the process of communication and compliance can be deeply ingrained into the psyche of the character identity held by your target within the social setting of your relationship. 

When the desired new behavior is exhibited by your target, all care should be made to frame their perception of any and all resulting consequences of the new behavior (negative or positive) in a way that will be received as evidence of progress toward their desired paradigm. (The attainment of social acceptance as their desired role in the relationship within the context of the given scene). Their perception of their evolving character identity must be consistent with that which is symbolic of the original emotional impetus within the social setting that defines the context of the relationship. This type of social interaction provides the context for the targets evolving self image. The target should subconsciously associate the desired behavior and consciously attribute the resulting success with your original value proposition. The target being convinced that they are more accepted by their social group as a result of their behavior will then begin to see themselves as a champion of the original value proposition, further cementing the overall positive view of the decisions and behaviors that have been changed in the target due to your influence, and causing these behaviors to be habitually assimilated into your targets evolving character identity. 

It is necessary to define the type of relationship sought between your character and your target. Relationships are by their nature complex, but by breaking a relationship down to simplistic descriptions and categories, general rules and expectations begin to become self apparent. By further developing terminology and nomenclature that describe the relationship, a standardized symbolic vocabulary can be developed that will aid in the communication of your desired influence as your desired character. This clarity of definition allows you to visualize the optimum exchange, provides a framework for the type of language used and rapport shared, and sets the stage for the utilization of other variables within the scene.  

It is also important to note that all descriptions of relationship and their labels, nomenclature, definition, and interactions are subject to your targets  personal interpretation. The common consensus of definitions within your target’s socio-cultural frame of reference can be a useful starting point for initial basic assumptions, but information received from your target during any rapport based communication should be used to properly gauge your targets actual idiosyncratic concepts of how a relationship is described and to properly adjust any factors of your communication that can be modified after it’s initial design. It is important to note that social definitions are dynamic and are themselves subject to influence. Definitions of abstract ideas as well as the interpretation and definition of symbolic meanings of concrete objects should not be seen as static or constant within the framework of your scene, but should be considered as objects that will interact with the scene based on certain preconceived solution sets that define behavior.

The relationship between your character and your target should not just be expressed as: buyer/seller, employer/employee, or customer/brand, etc., but should include descriptions of different aspect of common social archetypes, and should express considerations like polarity and social standing. A few common descriptions of roles within relationships are; leader, hero, mentor, guru, teacher, coach, student, follower, disciple, partner, sidekick, villain, rival, suitor, etc.

It is much easier to embody an already existing iconic and archetypal characteristic of your character within a relationship and allow your target to do the same while playing out the drama of the scene you are directing, than it is to reform your targets expectations and definition of that relationship, but sometimes it is necessary to replace your targets basic assumptions. This is a very complex subject and I will revisit this topic and cover in much greater depth in later articles.

This will conclude part one of this article. In part two I will cover different types of contacts, and media, as well as processes to control communication and more… Please feel free to comment, critique, or otherwise join in, and as always thank you!

The internal sale: WHY

 
The internal sale: WHY
(…on the human factor and optimizing cooperation and morale)
 
This will be the first in a series of short articles about ‘the internal sale”. In this article we will begin to establish the reasoning and the basis of why and how the internal sale is used to optimize the success driven culture in the workplace.
 
No matter how advanced our knowledge of mass marketing and targeted manipulation of perception and thought, if we focus solely on the customer / brand relationship, we will never fully optimize our results. Although it can be argued that customer focused approach is the best approach to creating business, as it turns out the internal dynamic can, and usually does have an impact that is at least as important on the quantity and quality of benefit realized from any expenditure of resources.
 
Our team is a dynamic social culture that should be engineered toward our desired outcome. This requires us to approach our internal relationships through the eyes of a sales process. We should think about our target market (our employees, contractors, consultants, etc.) and their motivations, fears, etc. We should engineer communications and internal processes that continually move individual mindsets towards the state that is most desirous for optimizing their required tasks. By “marketing to” and “selling” ourselves first, we can help to assure a passionately motivated dedication to the cause on the part of those relationships that we are charged with “managing”, making the culture of the workplace conducive to and self directed toward optimization and improvement.
 
Every directive given to a team member is one that should be delivered in a way that considers “selling” that team member on the idea behind the action as well as their ability to complete the tasks involved. Every behavioral modification requested of a team member should be engineered towards true cooperation and agreement rather than just compliance. “Selling” team members our ideas is the only proactive process of management that is available to us in attempting to realize our vision of success, just as “selling” our product or service to our customers is the only hope we have of shaping their initial subconscious ideas and opinions about them. It is much easier to manage any relationship if it starts out on the right foot than it is to stumble upon a relationship and try to maximize the outcome through our reactions. Controlling the framework of the relationship from the first impression to the conclusion is the difference between creating what is at best a successful endeavor, and creating an entity that takes on a life and power of it’s own. So, the entity that encompasses your idea (the BRAND) has to consider the face it presents to those relationship that are internal on a footing of equal importance to that which is presented to it’s prospective customers.
 
The future articles in this series will go on to discuss more of the “how to” as it relates to the internal sale. Please feel free to comment, criticize, provide links to relevant outside resources, or otherwise join in the open dialogue.
 
 

the purpose of our blog…

Welcome to our Blog! We have gotten many requests to publish a blog that would include random articles and musings about marketing, sales, and influential communications, as well as serious discussion and collaboration regarding the pertinent subjects of interest. We will use this blog as a forum to share insights and opinions about related topics, and offer an open invitation to others comment and participate. As always we appreciate your interest and input!

More About Genesis Solutions (How we got here from there…)

By Kenneth Cade, VP of Marketing.

 

In 2006 my wife Gayle and I decided to take advantage of her background in business administration and my background in marketing and sales as well as creative arts to go into business for ourselves. Our skills and talents seemed to compliment eachother well, and we had both been very successfull in our respective careers working in a wide range of industries. We had also both been involved in entrepreneurial endeavors of our own with varied levels of success and had worked with many other start-ups in one capacity or an other. We were confident that we could at least pay the bills and hoped for much more!
 
Like many others that go into business because they want the control and the other benefits that come with ownership, we didn’t have a definitive idea of what product or service we wanted to offer much less one that was market ready. In order to immediately replace the lost income from our day jobs while building our business on a shoestring budget, we decided to broker or resell products and services from other providers, while developing an internal structure that would allow our entire business model to evolve to take advantage of a changing environments and circumstances.
 
We initially focused on sourcing hard to find and highly sought after raw materials needed for manufacturing by defense contractors and other major OEMs. As a broker our main goal was to entice and accommodate a purchase, or to otherwise insert ourselves into the middle of an already established purchase decision and provide value by improving some portion of the buyer / seller relationship (i.e. guaranteed delivery, special terms, bundling or solution development, trust of relationship, etc.). As a broker we had to offer some type of improvement to the process that would justify our markup. We HAD TO add value to the transaction or it would simply happen without us, outside of our influence and ability to profit! Due to this unique position we gained valuable insight about the key factors of success, as well as a better understanding of the factors that create resistance, inefficiencies, bottlenecks, and roadblocks.
 
Our philosophy was that in order to prosper as brokers we simply had to do EVERYTHING better than everyone else! We had to market ourselves better to our customers, efficiently establishing trust-based relationships with buyers and procurement specialist so that we could properly assist them with their requirements. We had to understand and provide solutions to problems that were acting as roadblocks to the purchase. We had to communicate better and have better product and industry knowledge. We had to work with vendors to provide their information and products to the end users more effectively then they themselves did. We had to purchase more effectively, representing both sides of the transaction equally. We had to sell better and provide better fulfillment and customer after care. In order to succeed we needed to administer and manage all of these complex relationships of varied personalities and opposing interest efficiently and masterfully! We created a business culture that defined itself by that very challenge and we encouraged it to permeate every aspect of our day to day operations. Spending most of our initial efforts establishing outside sales channels and strong customer and vendor relationships as well as developing robust and comprehensive yet adaptable internal processes and systems we were quickly completely caught up in our new endeavor. Our passion and energy proved to be not only productive, but also infectious, as our business gained the critical mass of clients, partners, vendors, and contractors to provide a self-sustaining positive revenue and growth.
 
As we gradually shifted from start-up to growth and maintenance phase it became apparent that we had happened upon a very powerful combination of perspective, approach, and expertise. Our disproportionate success within the various industries that we competed began to more clearly demonstrate our real product of value. Our real “killer app” was our ability to manage complex human relationships through communication in order to create transaction symbiosis. We have since successfully applied our approach to marketing, sales, and other influential communications in varied industries.
 
Today, this is what we provide our customers…
 
We continue to strive every day to fully utilize the highest caliber of abilities, talents, and efforts to help our clients achieve their vision of success.